Access USB devices, such as video cameras and high-speed disks, from a virtual machine.
VMWARE VS PARALLELS PC
Migrate your physical Windows PC to a VMware Fusion virtual machine with the integrated Migration Assistant.
Import virtual machines created with Parallels Desktop, Microsoft Virtual PC for Mac, or virtual machines that use the OVF (Open Virtualization Format) standard.
Run most Windows 3D applications that require DirectX 9.0c with Shader Model 3, or OpenGL 2.1, on your Mac.
Run Windows and Linux applications on your Intel-based Mac.
VMWARE VS PARALLELS MAC OS X
Run x86 operating systems, including Windows, Linux, Mac OS X Server, Solaris and others, on Mac OS X without rebooting.
With VMware Fusion, you can perform the following tasks: With VMware Fusion, you can create, open, and run VMware virtual machines, and use PC-specific hardware with a Mac. With VMware Fusion, you can run virtual machines inside your Mac, which gives you access to a wide range of Windows and other x86 operating systems and applications. VMware Fusion harnesses visualization to give you a powerful tool to run PC applications and devices on your Mac. Fusion is still a good product, but it can definitely be improved upon.How to make the right choice for you? YouTube: VMware Fusion vs Parallels Understanding VMware Fusion I still stand by the fact that Parallels is a better product for like 90% of people's use case, but the fact that I can't work with. I understand why - graphical processing is done via CPU unless I had some kind of external card with PCI pass-through enabled, but I don't know if Fusion even supports that. A simple Youtube video will borderline max out my allocated CPU. However, on a different note, I will still say that anything with the slightest bit of graphics absolutely nukes Fusions performance. I just changed the DPI settings for all my Linux boxes with DEs, and it hasn't been a problem since. Thus, MacOS read my display as 1920 x 1080, but Fusion read my display as 3840 x 2160. My issue was that Fusion VM was reading my monitor's DPI directly, and not the DPI setting for MacOS. I figured out what the issue was after some tinkering. My issue with Fusion was solely with Linux (maybe BSD too but I haven't used it in years). I honestly should, because it might help offload some of the graphical work (so I have been told). I have never used RDP with any of my local VMs. I hate Parallels' subscription model, and maybe VMware shouldn't have laid off +800 developers, but until I see some improvements from VMware, I am sticking with Parallels. Long story short, I used to be a diehard VMware user, but Fusion 11 is probably the buggiest and worst release of theirs that I can remember. This has been an issue for months, and VMware couldn't care less. I can edit the Unit file to fix this, but I don't want to do this for every Linux VM. Turns out there is a bug in VMware Tools / Open-Vm-Tools where a race condition occurs because the VM Tools are loaded before the graphical session is loaded. It basically makes me manually fuck with my resolution settings EVERY TIME I resize the window, does not remember my settings upon login, etc. I have spent days trying to fix a display resolution issue with VMware, and there doesn't seem to be a real fix.
I never thought I would say this, but even though Parallels mainly caters to Windows, I am actually getting better Linux support out of Parallels than Fusion.
*Ignore this one below if you aren't tech-savvy* Parallels 'Cohesion Mode' > Fusion's 'Unity Mode'. Parallels also is big on joining your VM and Host OS's together, which I cannot stand, but I imagine I am an outlier on this one.įusion has better network configuration tools, but Parallels has really really improved over the years, so they might be closer. Parallels is probably easier to use, especially with Windows, but I prefer Fusion's GUI. Parallels preforms better under light gaming, but I wouldn't recommend using a VM for gaming by any means. It plays well with all of VMware's other services like server virtualization software, their cloud products, and their Windows/Linux counterpart ( VMware Workstation). The beauty of VMware is that it is pretty enterprise driven. I wouldn't use Parallels in a group setting unless everyone was using Parallels. VMware does not have this strict of a limitation, if any at all.Īs far as start-up, suspend, restart, and shutdown times? Parallels beats the hell out of Fusion. My benchmark scores have Fusion having a bit better benchmarks, however, iirc correctly, it was basically insignificant.įusion beats Parallels when it comes to needing to run the program on multiple machines. playing with various operating systems to become more familiar with them, light development, etc.? Then I'd probably just run with VirtualBox.